Sustainable salaries

Sustainable salaries

17.3 Sustained salaries

Some people believe that to fight poverty, everyone should earn the same comfortable salary. Recently this so-called ‘Universal Salary’ came back in the news again, as Spain wants to use it to fight the poverty caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. I disagree with this idea. I strongly believe that no healthy person should receive something for nothing.

When Calvin Benton started his psychotherapy company Spill, he also had the idea of paying everyone the same amount of money. He thought it would bring harmony to the team. Instead, he was forced to abandon the scheme within a year because of the rancour it created and pay people according to their seniority and expertise.
“We realised that we had to pay attention to market forces,” says Calvin. “Sometimes, traditional practices are there for a reason.”
Another example I encountered personally during my travels in Cuba. Here it was clear that the people who worked for governmental tourist businesses with a set minimum salary were way less motivated to provide a good service than those who managed their own business.

Hedonic adaption
The lack of motivation among people who earn the same salary no matter how hard they work can be explained through evolution. It is called the Hedonic adaptation, or treadmill and means that evolutionary we humans are always looking for ways to improve our lifestyle and be happier. And this is how it should be, at least from an evolutionary perspective, according to psychologists like Martin Seligman. Among our earliest ancestors, those who were perfectly content with what they had may have been left in the dust. Unhappy with the present and dreams of the future are what keep us motivated. Likely, perpetual bliss would completely undermine our will to accomplish anything at all. Like those people who smoked too much marijuana and are perfectly happy lying on the sofa doing nothing. Or even beggars who receive money for doing nothing.

Sustainable salaries
To bring more equality in our economy and still encourage people to perform better, might be the use of a scale system for salaries combined with a social network. What if international law could establish that CEOs, stockholders, managers, etc., do not earn more than a set percentage of their employee’s salaries? Say for example that the lowest-paid employee in a company gains a monthly salary of 2000 USD a month. Now each higher responsibility level in the company isn’t allowed to earn more than 10% extra. So the first-floor manager earns 2200 US$, the second building manager 2400 US$, the third 2600 US$, the fourth 2800 US$, and the fifth layer of responsibility is the CEO with a salary of 3000 US$ a month. If the CEO of the company wants to earn 3600 US$ a month, this will mean a 20% increase in salary. The lowest-paid employee in the company will then also have to receive a 20% increase and receives a 2400 US$ salary a month. If the company is very big, you could lower the percentage to 5%, as long as the increase and decrease of salaries always stay connected. This mutual benefit and responsibility strengthens the structure of a business.

Cover picture thanks to Nattanan on Pixabay.

Sustainability Blog Spiritual tourism 8.7 Spiritual tourism and the abuse of cultural traditions In a busy world were more people feel stressed, ancient, and exotic ways to ‘cure’ this stress are growing quickly in popularity. One of these exotic ways is participation in spiritual ceremonies with special plant extracts. The two Read more
Sustainability Blog Eco Lodges 8.6 The impact of Eco Lodges Let’s have a closer look at the Eco Lodges. From all tourist facilities, these lodges should have the least impact on the environment. Eco Lodges belong to some of the best-known products in Ecotourism. Their intention is good, but there are Read more
Sustainability Blog CO2 Responsability 7.5 The responsibility for carbon footprints To what extent should Western consumers take responsibility for the things they buy and do? If, say, a UK consumer purchases a TV manufactured in China, which nation should take responsibility for the emissions incurred during its manufacture? This dilemma illustrates Read more
Sustainability Blog Carbon offset 15.2 Natural carbon sequestration and offsets Although it is difficult to calculate exact numbers, several studies prove that earth is still absorbing more CO2 from the air then it produces naturally. This absorbing, also called CO2 sequestration, or carbon offset happens through many natural life systems including: Read more
Sustainability Blog Poverty and environment 9. The relation between poverty and our environment There are interesting relationships between wealth and environmental impact. Wealthy people are generally the biggest consumers and leave the biggest carbon footprint. However the poor are often bigger polluters in terms of dumping rubbish, illegal mining, poaching, and Read more
Sustainability Blog Renewables 5.5 Renewables What about clean energy from renewables? Solar power on earth is likely not going to be sustainable enough. Maybe in the future we can harvest solar power from space but for the moment giant wind farms can be a solution. In his book Heat from 2006, Read more
Sustainability Blog Seawater Greenhouse 5.4 Seawater Greenhouse For a more sustainable way of agriculture I like the approach of Seawater Greenhouse. A moist microclimate is created inside greenhouses in the desert through the use of an adapted pad and fan technology. Electric fans powered by solar power blow saltwater through pads Read more
Sustainability Blog Sustainable livestock 5.3 Sustainable livestock farming According to research from Savory, it will even be counterproductive to eliminate all livestock farming. It will be better to use managed grazing methods to restore grasslands and decrease atmospheric CO2 levels. Restoring grasslands stores CO2 from the air into plant material. Grazing Read more
Sustainability Blog Change our diet 5.1 Change our diet Agriculture contributes to about 16% of the total greenhouse gas emission. Depending on which study to believe, if we would all go completely vegan we might save about 23% to 70% of greenhouse gas emission from our current food supply. This is Read more

Copyright © 2020 Tourism vs Climate Change Powered by Fairtravel4u